reptides / MOTS-c

MOTS-c

MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded within mitochondrial 12S rRNA. Human studies mostly measure the body’s own MOTS-c. The completed drug trial tested CB4211, an engineered analogue, not the native MOTS-c sequence sold online.

mitochondrial-derived peptide

  • Canonical sequence MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR
  • Direct administration evidence is mainly in rodents
  • CB4211 is an analogue with a separate human record
  • No FDA-approved MOTS-c drug
Identity Human evidence Animal evidence Safety Status

Is CB4211 the same peptide as MOTS-c?

Native MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in mitochondrial DNA. CB4211 is an engineered analogue with its own formulation, pharmacokinetics, and clinical-development record.

Native MOTS-c and CB4211 have separate records
InterventionWhat exists in humansLimit
Native-sequence MOTS-cEndogenous measurements and observational associationsNo validated exogenous regimen or clinical outcome
CB4211 analogueCompleted Phase 1a/1b program with sponsor-reported topline dataExact native MOTS-c efficacy, safety, or dose
MOTS-c discovery · mouse metabolism

Cell and animal study

Lee C et al. Cell Metabolism, 2015.

The study identified a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in mitochondrial 12S rRNA and reported effects on metabolic homeostasis, obesity, and insulin resistance in cell and mouse experiments. It did not administer MOTS-c to people.

Participants / model
Cell systems and mice, including diet-induced metabolic models
Treatment
Synthetic native-sequence MOTS-c in experimental systems
Study design
Discovery, mechanistic, and animal intervention study
Read the original source
NCT03998514 · analogue, not native MOTS-c

Clinical trial registry record

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03998514.

The completed trial enrolled 88 participants across single- and multiple-ascending-dose cohorts and a small NAFLD cohort. It administered subcutaneous CB4211, an engineered MOTS-c analogue. The registry has no posted results and does not disclose the actual dose values.

Participants / model
Healthy non-obese adults and adults with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Treatment
CB4211 or placebo by subcutaneous injection
Follow-up
Single dose, seven-day repeat-dose, and four-week NAFLD portions
Study design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1a/1b
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

Results from CB4211 cannot be assigned to native-sequence MOTS-c.

Read the original source

Has native MOTS-c been administered in a credible human trial?

No credible completed trial has administered native MOTS-c to people. Human papers measure endogenous MOTS-c, NCT03998514 administered CB4211, and the nominal Hudson registry entry belongs to a cluster containing fictional, mock, or copied records and has no results.

Measuring a peptide before and after exercise shows association with human physiology. It does not establish absorption, pharmacokinetics, safety, or benefit after giving a synthetic product.

What did the CB4211 study report?

The sponsor reported short-term changes in ALT, AST, and glucose in a very small four-week NAFLD cohort, along with persistent injection-site reactions and a formulation judged unsuitable for further development. The registry itself posts no results.

NCT03998514 · analogue, not native MOTS-c

Clinical trial registry record

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03998514.

The completed trial enrolled 88 participants across single- and multiple-ascending-dose cohorts and a small NAFLD cohort. It administered subcutaneous CB4211, an engineered MOTS-c analogue. The registry has no posted results and does not disclose the actual dose values.

Participants / model
Healthy non-obese adults and adults with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Treatment
CB4211 or placebo by subcutaneous injection
Follow-up
Single dose, seven-day repeat-dose, and four-week NAFLD portions
Study design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1a/1b
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

Results from CB4211 cannot be assigned to native-sequence MOTS-c.

Read the original source
SEC filing · topline results and formulation problem

Sponsor regulatory filing

CohBar, Inc. Form 10-K for 2022, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

CohBar reported topline biomarker changes after four weeks, disclosed that the trial had been suspended in 2018 because of injection-site reactions, and later said the Phase 1b formulation was not suitable for further development. These are sponsor-reported CB4211 results, not peer-reviewed native MOTS-c data.

Participants / model
CB4211 Phase 1a/1b participants
Treatment
CB4211 analogue
Follow-up
Up to four weeks in the Phase 1b portion
Study design
Company report of trial and program status
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

The cited sources include no peer-reviewed clinical report or posted registry results.

Read the original source
Exercise study · human measures and mouse dosing

Translational human-observation and animal study

Reynolds JC et al. Nature Communications, 2021.

The paper linked MOTS-c to exercise and age-related muscle biology, measured human exercise-related signals, and reported that administering MOTS-c improved physical performance in mice of different ages. The human component did not test MOTS-c as a drug.

Participants / model
Human observational samples plus young, middle-aged, and old mice
Treatment
Exercise observations in humans; MOTS-c intervention in mice
Study design
Translational study with separate human and animal components

A human biomarker response is not human administration.

Read the original source
NCT03998514 · analogue, not native MOTS-c

Clinical trial registry record

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03998514.

The completed trial enrolled 88 participants across single- and multiple-ascending-dose cohorts and a small NAFLD cohort. It administered subcutaneous CB4211, an engineered MOTS-c analogue. The registry has no posted results and does not disclose the actual dose values.

Participants / model
Healthy non-obese adults and adults with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Treatment
CB4211 or placebo by subcutaneous injection
Follow-up
Single dose, seven-day repeat-dose, and four-week NAFLD portions
Study design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1a/1b
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

Results from CB4211 cannot be assigned to native-sequence MOTS-c.

Read the original source
ClinicalTrials.gov · native MOTS-c records and Hudson anomaly

Clinical trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov records for MOTS-c and related analogues.

The cited records include CB4211, observational studies that measure endogenous MOTS-c, and NCT07505745 under Hudson Biotech. The Hudson record belongs to the same suspect sponsor batch containing self-described fictional or mock records and copied unrelated development identifiers. It is treated as a registry anomaly, not confirmed native-MOTS-c administration.

The cited ClinicalTrials.gov and primary records include no credible completed trial administering native MOTS-c.

Read the original source

What does native MOTS-c do in experiments?

In cell and mouse studies, native MOTS-c altered metabolic-stress signaling and improved selected glucose, insulin-resistance, obesity, and physical-performance measures. Human therapeutic translation remains untested.

MOTS-c moved to the nucleus during metabolic stress and influenced gene expression in experimental systems. No human treatment study has established a clinical effect from that pathway.

Is it an exercise replacement?

No human trial tested that claim. The exercise paper combines human observational measurements with mouse intervention. Mouse treadmill performance does not establish a drug effect on human endurance.

Exercise study · human measures and mouse dosing

Translational human-observation and animal study

Reynolds JC et al. Nature Communications, 2021.

The paper linked MOTS-c to exercise and age-related muscle biology, measured human exercise-related signals, and reported that administering MOTS-c improved physical performance in mice of different ages. The human component did not test MOTS-c as a drug.

Participants / model
Human observational samples plus young, middle-aged, and old mice
Treatment
Exercise observations in humans; MOTS-c intervention in mice
Study design
Translational study with separate human and animal components

A human biomarker response is not human administration.

Read the original source
MOTS-c discovery · mouse metabolism

Cell and animal study

Lee C et al. Cell Metabolism, 2015.

The study identified a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in mitochondrial 12S rRNA and reported effects on metabolic homeostasis, obesity, and insulin resistance in cell and mouse experiments. It did not administer MOTS-c to people.

Participants / model
Cell systems and mice, including diet-induced metabolic models
Treatment
Synthetic native-sequence MOTS-c in experimental systems
Study design
Discovery, mechanistic, and animal intervention study
Read the original source
Mechanism · stress-responsive nuclear signaling

Cell and animal mechanism study

Kim KH et al. Cell Metabolism, 2018.

Under metabolic stress, MOTS-c moved to the nucleus and altered nuclear gene expression in experimental systems. The study did not administer MOTS-c to people or measure a clinical outcome.

Participants / model
Cell systems and mice
Treatment
Experimental MOTS-c exposure and stress conditions
Study design
Mechanistic molecular study
Read the original source
Exercise study · human measures and mouse dosing

Translational human-observation and animal study

Reynolds JC et al. Nature Communications, 2021.

The paper linked MOTS-c to exercise and age-related muscle biology, measured human exercise-related signals, and reported that administering MOTS-c improved physical performance in mice of different ages. The human component did not test MOTS-c as a drug.

Participants / model
Human observational samples plus young, middle-aged, and old mice
Treatment
Exercise observations in humans; MOTS-c intervention in mice
Study design
Translational study with separate human and animal components

A human biomarker response is not human administration.

Read the original source

What are the main safety unknowns?

Native-MOTS-c human pharmacokinetics, dose-response, immunogenicity, repeated-use safety, pregnancy effects, and organ-specific risks remain unknown. CB4211’s injection-site problem is a warning about its analogue and formulation, not a measured event rate for native MOTS-c.

  • Analogue transfer: CB4211 cannot supply a native-MOTS-c safety profile.
  • Metabolic signaling: changes in glucose handling could matter alongside diabetes drugs, fasting, illness, or exercise, but interactions have not been characterized.
  • Product quality: synthetic research products add sequence, concentration, sterility, endotoxin, and degradation uncertainty.
SEC filing · topline results and formulation problem

Sponsor regulatory filing

CohBar, Inc. Form 10-K for 2022, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

CohBar reported topline biomarker changes after four weeks, disclosed that the trial had been suspended in 2018 because of injection-site reactions, and later said the Phase 1b formulation was not suitable for further development. These are sponsor-reported CB4211 results, not peer-reviewed native MOTS-c data.

Participants / model
CB4211 Phase 1a/1b participants
Treatment
CB4211 analogue
Follow-up
Up to four weeks in the Phase 1b portion
Study design
Company report of trial and program status
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

The cited sources include no peer-reviewed clinical report or posted registry results.

Read the original source
FDA safety page · no human exposure data

FDA safety communication

US Food and Drug Administration.

FDA reports no human exposure data for drug products containing MOTS-c and cites immunogenicity, peptide-impurity, and API-characterization concerns.

Study design
Agency safety summary

The FDA assessment concerns MOTS-c itself rather than CB4211.

Read the original source

Did FDA approve MOTS-c in 2026?

FDA staff recommended against 503A bulks-list inclusion in the July 2026 review, and the cited FDA records list no approved MOTS-c drug or dosing label.

Committee review is not marketing approval. CB4211’s IND-era development also does not approve native MOTS-c or a seller product.

FDA 2026 briefing · MOTS-c evidence review

FDA staff briefing document

US Food and Drug Administration, July 2026.

FDA staff separated MOTS-c from related analogues, reviewed the mainly nonclinical evidence and human safety gap, and recommended against 503A bulks-list inclusion. The advisory process did not approve MOTS-c.

Study design
Regulatory evidence review
Read the original source
FDA safety page · no human exposure data

FDA safety communication

US Food and Drug Administration.

FDA reports no human exposure data for drug products containing MOTS-c and cites immunogenicity, peptide-impurity, and API-characterization concerns.

Study design
Agency safety summary

The FDA assessment concerns MOTS-c itself rather than CB4211.

Read the original source

Studies and sources

MOTS-c discovery · mouse metabolism

Cell and animal study

Lee C et al. Cell Metabolism, 2015.

The study identified a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in mitochondrial 12S rRNA and reported effects on metabolic homeostasis, obesity, and insulin resistance in cell and mouse experiments. It did not administer MOTS-c to people.

Participants / model
Cell systems and mice, including diet-induced metabolic models
Treatment
Synthetic native-sequence MOTS-c in experimental systems
Study design
Discovery, mechanistic, and animal intervention study
Read the original source
Mechanism · stress-responsive nuclear signaling

Cell and animal mechanism study

Kim KH et al. Cell Metabolism, 2018.

Under metabolic stress, MOTS-c moved to the nucleus and altered nuclear gene expression in experimental systems. The study did not administer MOTS-c to people or measure a clinical outcome.

Participants / model
Cell systems and mice
Treatment
Experimental MOTS-c exposure and stress conditions
Study design
Mechanistic molecular study
Read the original source
Exercise study · human measures and mouse dosing

Translational human-observation and animal study

Reynolds JC et al. Nature Communications, 2021.

The paper linked MOTS-c to exercise and age-related muscle biology, measured human exercise-related signals, and reported that administering MOTS-c improved physical performance in mice of different ages. The human component did not test MOTS-c as a drug.

Participants / model
Human observational samples plus young, middle-aged, and old mice
Treatment
Exercise observations in humans; MOTS-c intervention in mice
Study design
Translational study with separate human and animal components

A human biomarker response is not human administration.

Read the original source
NCT03998514 · analogue, not native MOTS-c

Clinical trial registry record

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03998514.

The completed trial enrolled 88 participants across single- and multiple-ascending-dose cohorts and a small NAFLD cohort. It administered subcutaneous CB4211, an engineered MOTS-c analogue. The registry has no posted results and does not disclose the actual dose values.

Participants / model
Healthy non-obese adults and adults with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Treatment
CB4211 or placebo by subcutaneous injection
Follow-up
Single dose, seven-day repeat-dose, and four-week NAFLD portions
Study design
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1a/1b
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

Results from CB4211 cannot be assigned to native-sequence MOTS-c.

Read the original source
SEC filing · topline results and formulation problem

Sponsor regulatory filing

CohBar, Inc. Form 10-K for 2022, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

CohBar reported topline biomarker changes after four weeks, disclosed that the trial had been suspended in 2018 because of injection-site reactions, and later said the Phase 1b formulation was not suitable for further development. These are sponsor-reported CB4211 results, not peer-reviewed native MOTS-c data.

Participants / model
CB4211 Phase 1a/1b participants
Treatment
CB4211 analogue
Follow-up
Up to four weeks in the Phase 1b portion
Study design
Company report of trial and program status
Funding
CohBar, Inc.

The cited sources include no peer-reviewed clinical report or posted registry results.

Read the original source
ClinicalTrials.gov · native MOTS-c records and Hudson anomaly

Clinical trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov records for MOTS-c and related analogues.

The cited records include CB4211, observational studies that measure endogenous MOTS-c, and NCT07505745 under Hudson Biotech. The Hudson record belongs to the same suspect sponsor batch containing self-described fictional or mock records and copied unrelated development identifiers. It is treated as a registry anomaly, not confirmed native-MOTS-c administration.

The cited ClinicalTrials.gov and primary records include no credible completed trial administering native MOTS-c.

Read the original source
FDA safety page · no human exposure data

FDA safety communication

US Food and Drug Administration.

FDA reports no human exposure data for drug products containing MOTS-c and cites immunogenicity, peptide-impurity, and API-characterization concerns.

Study design
Agency safety summary

The FDA assessment concerns MOTS-c itself rather than CB4211.

Read the original source
FDA 2026 briefing · MOTS-c evidence review

FDA staff briefing document

US Food and Drug Administration, July 2026.

FDA staff separated MOTS-c from related analogues, reviewed the mainly nonclinical evidence and human safety gap, and recommended against 503A bulks-list inclusion. The advisory process did not approve MOTS-c.

Study design
Regulatory evidence review
Read the original source

Why is MOTS-c in B tier?

The B grade reflects substantial cell and animal research plus human biomarker studies. Native MOTS-c has no credible administered-human trial, and CB4211 is a different molecule.

reptides couldn’t finish loading.

check your connection, then try again. your saved data stays put.