vip
a chemical the body makes in its own gut, lungs and nerves to widen blood vessels and relax the muscle in the walls of airways and gut. drug companies made a synthetic copy of it and took it into trials for damaged lungs. four randomized trials in COVID-19 respiratory failure, a 665-patient meta-analysis, and a plasma half-time of about one minute. the biggest trial was stopped for futility. the one trial that clearly beat placebo is for erectile dysfunction, an indication nobody researches it for.
tier D · healing · phase 3 TESICO · stopped for futility 2022
verdict
it was tested properly for damaged lungs and it failed there. given by intravenous drip for COVID-19 lung failure, the trials came back with no benefit. injected into the penis with phentolamine it produces an erection in most men, and that combination is licensed in three countries as Invicorp. a 461-patient NIH-run phase 3 halted for futility, a pooled survival odds ratio of 1.01 across the two randomized trials in the 2025 meta-analysis (611 patients), and one clearly positive randomized trial in erectile dysfunction by intracavernosal injection.
on whether VIP works for ARDS, COVID or lung inflammation: on the randomized evidence, no. TESICO, the only large independently run trial (NIAID, 471 randomized and 461 analyzed, 28 US sites), missed every outcome: day-90 ordinal odds ratio 1.11 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.55, p=0.54), 86 of 231 deaths on drug against 83 of 230 on placebo, hazard ratio 1.04. the data monitoring board stopped the arm for futility on 25 May 2022, at 471 of a planned 640, with conditional power down to 12.4%. a 2025 meta-analysis of 9 studies and 665 patients pools survival across the only two randomized trials in it, 611 patients, at an odds ratio of 1.01 (0.72 to 1.42); its seven uncontrolled case series contribute 54 patients and nothing to that estimate. the sponsor-run 196-patient trial quoted as a survival doubling missed its own primary endpoint, and its primary and secondary endpoints were reversed in February 2021 while it was running.
on intranasal VIP, CIRS and mold illness: there is no registered trial. a ClinicalTrials.gov sweep returns zero entries for intranasal VIP in chronic inflammatory response syndrome, mold illness or water-damaged-building exposure. the two papers the protocol rests on sit outside the indexed literature: an open-label 20-patient report in a Scientific Research Publishing journal with no control arm, and a 2017 imaging paper whose abstract states no patient count and describes no control group. separately, the molecule clears human plasma with a half-time of about one minute, so a nasal spray produces a different exposure from the one the randomized trials measured.
on why this is not an F: because VIP is unmistakably active in people, and one randomized trial is clearly positive. injected into the corpus cavernosum with phentolamine, it produced a response in 75% of men against 12% on placebo (n=171, p<0.001) and carries national marketing authorizations as Invicorp. F is for a compound that is fake, a scam, or actively harmful beyond reasonable doubt. a real positive trial and a real regulatory decision rule that out.
based on published trials, trial registries and regulatory records. VIP is not FDA-approved for any indication. not medical advice.
why D-tier
D, and the volume of human data is high. VIP carries more human evidence than most research peptides: four randomized trials in COVID-19 respiratory failure, a placebo-controlled randomized trial in erectile dysfunction, a 665-patient meta-analysis, five decades of human pharmacology since Said and Mutt isolated it in 1970, and national marketing authorizations in three countries. the direction of that evidence sets the grade. pooled across the only two randomized trials in the 2025 meta-analysis, 611 patients, survival gives an odds ratio of 1.01 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.42). TESICO, the only large independently run trial, missed every outcome and was stopped for futility on 25 May 2022, at 471 of a planned 640 with conditional power at 12.4%. large, well run, and conflicting is exactly what D describes. the tier also turns on a split. respiratory failure was tested adequately and came back negative. intranasal use for chronic inflammatory response syndrome has never been measured. those are two different answers. why not C: C is the mostly-preclinical slot. VIP's base is human, and randomized trials in two indications plus five decades of infusion pharmacology disqualify a preclinical grade. why not F: VIP is unmistakably active in people. injected into the corpus cavernosum with phentolamine it produced a response in 75% of men against 12% on placebo (n=171, p<0.001) and carries national authorizations as Invicorp. F would have to erase a genuine positive trial and a real regulatory decision. why not B: B implies the randomized record supports the compound and is only incomplete. the best-powered trial is null. the positive COVID-19 trial is a sponsor-run 196-patient study whose primary endpoint missed and whose primary and secondary endpoints were reversed while it ran. the route the community literature describes has never been entered into a trial registry this sweep could reach, and the molecule survives about a minute in blood.
the core tension
the one indication where VIP clearly beats placebo in a randomized trial is erectile dysfunction, by injection directly into the corpus cavernosum, combined with phentolamine, authorized in three countries and sold by nobody in this market. the indication it is actually researched for, intranasal anti-inflammatory and neurological use, has never been entered into a trial registry this sweep could reach. sitting between those two facts is a 461-patient phase 3 that found nothing on any endpoint and a molecule with a one-minute plasma half-time, which means a nasal spray delivers a different exposure from every trial that measured an effect.
what it is
A chemical message the body makes in its own gut, lungs and nerves. It tells blood vessels to widen and tells the muscle in the walls of airways and gut to let go. The molecule is a 28-amino-acid peptide. Sami Said and Viktor Mutt isolated it from hog small intestine and published it in Science in 1970 while chasing a vasodilator, and the name is a description of what they found. It sits in the secretin and glucagon superfamily alongside PACAP and acts at two receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2. The synthetic version carries an International Nonproprietary Name, aviptadil. It has been trialed as Zyesami and, combined with phentolamine mesilate, is sold as Invicorp. It is not FDA-approved for any indication.
what it does
It widens blood vessels and loosens the muscle in the walls of vessels, airways and gut. That is the effect it was named for and the effect that shows up first in every human infusion study: the 1978 pharmacokinetic work recorded flushing, a raised pulse and a widened blood-pressure amplitude at the top dose. The anti-inflammatory case is largely animal and cell work. VIP shifts T-cell populations toward a regulatory phenotype in collagen-induced arthritis in mice, and damps inflammatory signaling in cultured human cells. In a 20-patient open-label sarcoidosis study, nebulized VIP lowered TNF-alpha in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and raised regulatory T cells there, with no lung-function or symptom endpoint reported.
origin
Said and Mutt published the isolation in Science in 1970, and Said spent decades on the lung biology that followed. The COVID program grew out of that line. VPAC receptors are dense on lung epithelium, plasma VIP was found to be elevated in severe COVID-19 and to correlate with survival, and VIP protected SARS-CoV-2-infected cells in culture. NRx Pharmaceuticals and Relief Therapeutics turned that into Zyesami and took it to the FDA. The erectile-dysfunction line ran separately, and is the one that ended in an actual approval.
why researchers are interested
Two unrelated audiences arrived at the same molecule. During COVID the ARDS program drew heavy coverage and a widely repeated survival headline. Independently, an intranasal protocol for chronic inflammatory response syndrome built a following in the mold-illness world on the strength of a real animal anti-inflammatory literature. Both readings stop short of the trial record. The ARDS headline came from a secondary endpoint in a sponsor-run study that missed its primary. The intranasal protocol has never been entered into a trial registry.
does it work
Three questions get asked of it, and they have three different answers. For ARDS and COVID-19 it was tested properly and it failed. TESICO, NIH-run and triple-masked, missed its day-90 primary at an odds ratio of 1.11 (0.80 to 1.55, p=0.54) and ran a hair the wrong way on death, 86 of 231 against 83 of 230, hazard ratio 1.04. Pooled across the two randomized trials that exist, 611 patients, survival sits at an odds ratio of 1.01 (0.72 to 1.42). For erectile dysfunction by intracavernosal injection with phentolamine, yes: 75% response against 12% on placebo in 171 men, p<0.001, and marketing authorizations in three countries. For intranasal anti-inflammatory or neurological use, nobody has measured it. No trial is registered anywhere this sweep could reach. That leaves it untested, which is a separate answer from the lung result.
key facts
- molecular formula: C₁₄₇H₂₃₈N₄₄O₄₂S
- molecular weight: ~3325.8 g/mol
- amino acids: 28
- half-life: ~1 minute plasma disappearance half-time (IV, human, n=4)
- type: secretin/glucagon-family neuropeptide; VPAC1 + VPAC2 agonist
- CAS: 40077-57-4 (aviptadil, synthetic VIP)
- 461 analyzed in TESICO, arm stopped for futility
- 1.01 pooled survival odds ratio, 611 randomized
- ~1 min plasma disappearance half-time, n=4
- 0 registered trials of intranasal VIP
frequently asked questions
What is VIP?
VIP stands for vasoactive intestinal peptide, a signal the body makes in its own gut, lungs and nerves to widen blood vessels and relax the muscle in the walls of hollow organs. A synthetic copy of it has been developed as a medicine, mostly for damaged and inflamed lungs. It is a 28-amino-acid signaling peptide isolated from hog small intestine in 1970 by Said and Mutt, and it acts at the VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors. The synthetic form carries the International Nonproprietary Name aviptadil, was trialed in COVID-19 as Zyesami, and combined with phentolamine is sold as Invicorp for erectile dysfunction in the UK, Denmark and New Zealand. It is not FDA-approved for any indication.
What does VIP do?
Two things, and they sit far apart. First, it widens blood vessels and loosens smooth muscle, which is the effect it was named for and the first thing that appears in every human infusion study. That widening is the effect behind the one licensed medicine built on it, Invicorp, which is injected into the penis with phentolamine and produced an erection in 75% of men against 12% on placebo in the trial behind that authorization. Second, in animals and in cultured human cells it turns down inflammatory signaling, which is why it was developed as a drug for damaged lungs, and in people that lung use has failed. That immune evidence is mostly animal and cell work with one small human readout: VIP induces regulatory T cells in animal models of arthritis, and in a 20-patient open-label sarcoidosis study nebulized VIP lowered TNF-alpha and raised regulatory T cells in lavage fluid. For acute respiratory distress syndrome and COVID-19, where it has been tested hardest, the randomized evidence is null: a 2025 meta-analysis of 9 studies and 665 patients pooled survival across the only two randomized trials in it, 611 patients, at an odds ratio of 1.01 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.42), and the largest and only independently run trial was stopped for futility.
How is VIP administered in the trials that studied it?
By continuous intravenous infusion, by nebulizer, or by intracavernosal injection, depending on the trial. TESICO used a 12-hour intravenous infusion daily for 3 days. The sarcoidosis and COVID-19 inhalation studies used a nebulizer. The erectile-dysfunction trials used direct intracavernosal injection with phentolamine. The reason is how fast it disappears. The human plasma disappearance half-time is about one minute, and a granted patent from a company that spent a decade engineering around that number describes native VIP as impractical as a pharmaceutical agent. The intranasal route that dominates community protocols does not appear in any registered trial this sweep could reach.
What are the side effects of VIP?
The reported effects read like the vasodilator it is. In TESICO, hypotension during infusion was recorded in 135 of 231 on drug (58.4%) against 95 of 230 on placebo (41.3%), p<0.001, flushing in 34 against 14, and mean arterial pressure ran 5 to 7 mmHg lower on drug on days 2 and 3 (p<0.001); infusions were paused in 31% of the drug arm against 15% of placebo, and the authors wrote that this suggests a higher dose would not be well tolerated. In the sponsor-run COVID-AIV trial, diarrhea occurred in 32.8% on drug against 1.5% on placebo (p<0.0001). The 1978 human infusion study recorded flushing, raised pulse and raised blood-pressure amplitude at the top dose. In the intracavernosal erectile-dysfunction trial, transient facial flushing accompanied 40% of 1711 injections and one priapism episode was recorded. Long-term exposure has not been characterized in any controlled human study.
Is VIP FDA approved?
No. There are zero Drugs@FDA records for aviptadil, Zyesami or Invicorp, and zero EMA centralized authorizations across 1,982 register records. An emergency use authorization was applied for on 31 May 2021 and the FDA declined it in November 2021 on insufficient data, noting it had reviewed 131 randomized patients; breakthrough therapy designation was also denied. Four FDA and four EU orphan designations issued between 1993 and February 2026 have produced no approval. The only marketing authorizations anywhere are national ones for the aviptadil plus phentolamine combination in erectile dysfunction, by intracavernosal injection, held in the UK, Denmark and New Zealand.
Is intranasal VIP studied for CIRS or mold illness?
Not in any registered trial. A ClinicalTrials.gov sweep on 25 July 2026 returned zero entries for intranasal VIP in chronic inflammatory response syndrome, mold illness or water-damaged-building exposure. The two supporting papers sit outside the indexed literature: a 2013 open-label report of 20 patients in a Scientific Research Publishing journal, with no placebo and no control arm, and a 2017 imaging paper in Internal Medicine Review whose abstract states no patient count and describes no control group. A PubMed search for that author on VIP returns zero records, while the same author is indexed for other work on the syndrome. WHO ICTRP registries were outside this sweep, so a non-US trial would not have appeared.
related peptides
- kpv: anti-inflammatory tripeptide, thinner human record but the same immune lane
- thymosin α-1: immune-modulating peptide with approvals abroad and a narrow indication
- larazotide: the other clean mechanism on this tier that failed its pivotal
- pt-141: the sexual-function peptide with an FDA approval, different mechanism entirely
reptides grades the research record and cites the literature behind every call. research reference only; not medical advice.