Cortexin
updated
Cortexin is a Russian prescription mixture of water-soluble polypeptide fractions from cattle cerebral cortex, listed for add-on use in stroke, brain injury and other conditions, with no single formula and no US label. One double-blind placebo-controlled stroke trial in 272 patients reports high efficacy and safety but gives no numbers in its abstract, and a US rat study found no effect on function or infarct size. A PubMed search on 10 October 2026 for healthy people found no placebo-controlled test of cognition.
Brain-derived polypeptide mixture (ATC N06BX)
- The Russian label (version dated 10 February 2022) describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions of cattle cerebral cortex, each with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da; PubChem has no compound record for it.
- One double-blind placebo-controlled stroke trial (272 patients, 2014) reports high efficacy and safety, and its abstract gives no numbers.
- A 490-patient stroke trial compared intravenous with intramuscular Cortexin, and every patient received Cortexin, so it does not test Cortexin against placebo.
- The 2023 Cochrane review pooling Cerebrolysin and Cortexin found probably little to no difference in all-cause death (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41).
- A blinded US rat embolic-stroke study found no difference from saline in function or infarct size after Cortexin.
- ClinicalTrials.gov searches returned 0 records, and openFDA and DailyMed searches on 10 October 2026 found no US label.
What is Cortexin, and is it approved?
Cortexin is a Russian prescription mixture of water-soluble polypeptide fractions from cattle cerebral cortex, with no single formula. It has no US label; a Russian label lists it for add-on use in stroke, brain injury and other conditions.
The Russian prescribing information reproduced on rlsnet.ru (manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022) lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle (ATC code N06BX), in a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. This is a Russian regional label, not an FDA or EMA review. Sellers describe calf or pig brain, and pig sourcing is not confirmed for Cortexin in the sources reviewed.
Every indication is given as part of complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy.
Leaflet copies on medi.ru print registration number R N003862/02 for the 10 mg product (copy dated 8 February 2019, the R in Cyrillic letters) and LSR-003190/09 for the 5 mg product (copy dated 4 February 2019). They name Geropharm LLC, and for the 10 mg product also Firma Ferment LLC, both in Russia, as manufacturers and state prescription-only dispensing. The copies are on a commercial site, not the Russian state register, so current registration status and label version are not confirmed here.
There is no single formula. A PubChem name query for cortexin returned no compound, and three substance records carry the name and registry number 83270-84-2 with no linked compound, formula, molecular weight or structure. The word also names unrelated items in PubMed (a neuron-specific membrane protein, a cortexin 3 gene and renal cortexin blood-pressure papers), and Cortagen is a different product. A vendor vial sold as Cortexin cannot be matched to the studied product from public records.
openFDA Drugs@FDA searches on 10 October 2026 for generic name, brand name and active ingredient cortexin each returned no matches, and DailyMed searches returned zero labels, so there is no US label.
Russian label (rlsnet.ru copy, version of 10 February 2022): composition, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions
Official label
rlsnet.ru drug encyclopedia. Kortexin (Cortexin) lyophilisate for intramuscular solution, Russian prescribing information, manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022; the site's own page-update date reads 21 September 2026.
The label lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, ATC code N06BX, as a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. All indications are given in complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy. It is contraindicated in individual intolerance, pregnancy (the label cites lack of clinical trial data) and lactation. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components. Every listed adverse reaction is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching, allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence, hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia, chills; raised blood pressure. Lidocaine as the injection solvent is not recommended in children because it is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate for intramuscular injection
- Follow-up
- Label version dated 10 February 2022
- Study design
- Russian-language prescribing information reproduced on a drug-information site; a regional label, not an FDA or EMA review
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label's pharmacology statements (nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects, passage through the blood-brain barrier) are manufacturer text, not trial results. The Russian text was translated for this page. The label version read is dated 10 February 2022, and a later version may differ.
Read the original sourceTwo Russian leaflet copies (2019): registration numbers, manufacturers, prescription-only
Official label
medi.ru drug-information site. Kortexin leaflet copies for the 10 mg product (copy dated 8 February 2019) and the 5 mg product (copy dated 4 February 2019).
Two Russian leaflet copies on medi.ru give registration numbers and manufacturers. The 10 mg leaflet (copy dated 8 February 2019) prints registration number R N003862/02, the R in Cyrillic letters, with the grouping name polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, glycine in each vial, prescription-only dispensing, a 3-year shelf life, and two manufacturers: Geropharm LLC and Firma Ferment LLC, both in Russia. The 5 mg leaflet (copy dated 4 February 2019) prints registration number LSR-003190/09 and Geropharm LLC as manufacturer.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate, intramuscular
- Follow-up
- Leaflet copies dated February 2019
- Study design
- Russian-language leaflet copies hosted on a commercial drug-information site
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The copies are on a commercial site, not the Russian state register, so current registration status and label version are not confirmed here.
Read the original sourcePubChem: no compound record, three substance records, no formula or structure
Chemical identity record
National Library of Medicine. PubChem substance records SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox), registry number 83270-84-2; PubChem name query for cortexin run on 10 October 2026.
A PubChem name query for cortexin returned no compound (No CID found). Three substance records carry the name and the same registry number, 83270-84-2: SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox). None has a linked compound, so there is no formula, molecular weight or structure. The word also names unrelated things in PubMed: an 82-residue neuron-specific membrane protein called cortexin (PMID 8336151), a cortexin 3 gene paper (PMID 17786280) and renal cortexin blood-pressure papers (PMID 20409952), so a bare search mixes them in. A different product, the brain cortex tetrapeptide Cortagen (named in the title of PMID 15159690), also turns up in the same search results and is not this preparation.
- Participants / model
- Chemical identity, not a clinical population
- Treatment
- Undefined mixture of polypeptide fractions
- Follow-up
- Not applicable
- Study design
- NLM chemical substance records
- Funding
- not stated in the source
Identity record only. A vendor vial sold as Cortexin cannot be matched to the studied product from public records.
Read the original sourceSearches, 10 October 2026: 217 PubMed records, 0 registered trials, no US label
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026 for cortexin, 217 records returned. ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA Drugs@FDA and DailyMed searches run the same day.
The PubMed search returned 217 records, of which 150 are flagged Russian-language and 102 appeared in a single Russian journal (Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova). The titles of the 80 most relevant results and the abstracts of the studies cited on this page were reviewed. Two human trials were double-blind (the 490-patient route comparison and the 272-patient placebo-controlled trial); the other human studies reviewed were open, comparison-group or uncontrolled designs with no blinding stated in the abstract. No English-language randomized placebo-controlled human trial of Cortexin turned up. ClinicalTrials.gov API searches returned 0 records each for cortexin, the Cyrillic brand name, polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle, Geropharm ischemic stroke and Geropharm cerebral, so registration of the trials above cannot be confirmed. openFDA Drugs@FDA searches on generic name, brand name and active ingredient cortexin each returned no matches, and DailyMed searches for cortexin, cerebral cortex polypeptides and polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle returned zero labels, so there is no US label.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Searches run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature, registry and regulator database searches
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what the databases returned on that date. It is not proof that no unindexed study or registration exists. Eurasian Economic Union and other post-Soviet registrations were not looked up.
Read the original sourceWhat did the stroke studies find?
One double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 272 patients with ischemic stroke reported high efficacy and safety, but its abstract gives no numbers. A 490-patient trial compared intravenous with intramuscular Cortexin and had no placebo arm. The Cochrane review that pools Cortexin with Cerebrolysin found probably little to no difference in all-cause death.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses, one course then a placebo course, or two placebo courses, over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding. It is the only blinded placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed.
A 2025 multicenter randomized double-blind trial in 490 adults aged 30 to 80 with acute ischemic stroke in Russia compared Cortexin 10 mg intravenously (n = 246) with Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly (n = 244) twice a day for 10 days, then 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin for both groups, with 90 days of follow-up. The abstract calls the design placebo-controlled, but the placebo only masks the route and every patient received Cortexin, so there was no placebo-only arm and the trial says nothing about whether Cortexin beats placebo. On day 90, 93.64% of the intravenous group and 86.50% of the intramuscular group had a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2; NIHSS fell by 3.93 and 3.72 and the MMSE gain was 4.11 and 3.88 (p = 0.249).
The 2023 Cochrane review of Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like agents in acute ischaemic stroke included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the 272-patient Cortexin trial, which it rated at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death.
A PubMed search on 10 October 2026 returned 217 records for cortexin, 150 flagged Russian-language. No English-language randomized placebo-controlled human trial turned up.
Placebo-controlled stroke trial, 2014: 272 patients, no numbers in the abstract
Randomized controlled trial
Aliferova VM et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(4):41-6. PMID 24874316.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses (group 1), one course then a placebo course (group 2), or two placebo courses (group 3), over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group, and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding.
- Participants / model
- 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day versus placebo
- Follow-up
- 70 days
- Study design
- Multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, three groups
- Funding
- not stated in the source
This is the only blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed. The abstract gives no endpoints, effect sizes or funding.
Read the original sourceRoute trial: 490 patients, intravenous versus intramuscular Cortexin, no placebo arm
Clinical trial
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2025;125(12):60-67. PMID 41524350.
In 490 patients aged 30 to 80 with acute ischemic stroke, Cortexin 10 mg intravenous plus placebo intramuscular twice a day (n = 246) was compared with Cortexin 10 mg intramuscular plus placebo intravenous twice a day (n = 244) for 10 days, then both groups got 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up. On day 90, 93.64% of the intravenous group and 86.50% of the intramuscular group had a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2; NIHSS fell by 3.93 and 3.72; the MMSE gain was 4.11 and 3.88 (p = 0.249). Adverse events were 74 in 60 patients (intravenous) and 51 in 41 patients (intramuscular), not different (p above 0.05).
- Participants / model
- 490 adults with acute ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg twice a day, intravenous versus intramuscular
- Follow-up
- 10 days of randomized treatment, then 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up
- Study design
- Multicenter randomized double-blind route comparison with a double-dummy placebo; every patient received Cortexin
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The abstract calls the design placebo-controlled, but the placebo only masks the route and every patient received Cortexin, so there is no placebo-only or no-treatment arm and the trial says nothing about whether Cortexin beats placebo. Funding is not stated in the abstract.
Read the original sourceCochrane 2023: 7 trials, 1773 participants, probably little or no effect on death
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ziganshina LE et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;10(10):CD007026. PMID 37818733.
The review included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the one Cortexin trial (272 participants), which it judged at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome (death or dependence) or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death. The increase in non-fatal serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants) is stated for Cerebrolysin, not for Cortexin.
- Participants / model
- Adults with acute ischaemic stroke across pooled randomized trials
- Treatment
- Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures, including Cortexin in one trial
- Follow-up
- Pooled randomized trials
- Study design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The serious-adverse-event signal is a class caution only, because it is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin.
Read the original sourceSearches, 10 October 2026: 217 PubMed records, 0 registered trials, no US label
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026 for cortexin, 217 records returned. ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA Drugs@FDA and DailyMed searches run the same day.
The PubMed search returned 217 records, of which 150 are flagged Russian-language and 102 appeared in a single Russian journal (Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova). The titles of the 80 most relevant results and the abstracts of the studies cited on this page were reviewed. Two human trials were double-blind (the 490-patient route comparison and the 272-patient placebo-controlled trial); the other human studies reviewed were open, comparison-group or uncontrolled designs with no blinding stated in the abstract. No English-language randomized placebo-controlled human trial of Cortexin turned up. ClinicalTrials.gov API searches returned 0 records each for cortexin, the Cyrillic brand name, polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle, Geropharm ischemic stroke and Geropharm cerebral, so registration of the trials above cannot be confirmed. openFDA Drugs@FDA searches on generic name, brand name and active ingredient cortexin each returned no matches, and DailyMed searches for cortexin, cerebral cortex polypeptides and polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle returned zero labels, so there is no US label.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Searches run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature, registry and regulator database searches
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what the databases returned on that date. It is not proof that no unindexed study or registration exists. Eurasian Economic Union and other post-Soviet registrations were not looked up.
Read the original sourceWhat do the studies outside stroke show?
Adult and pediatric studies in Russia report benefits on symptom scales and tests, but they are open, comparison-group or uncontrolled designs, and none is a placebo-controlled trial.
In 189 patients with stage I to II chronic cerebral ischemia (mean age 64.3), randomized to Cortexin 20 mg or 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days or to basic treatment only, the abstract reports a dose-dependent effect on neurological symptoms, asthenia and sleep, an antioxidant effect, and insignificant antidepressant and anxiolytic effects. In 98 patients with depressive disorder, Cortexin added to an antidepressant (n = 48) beat the antidepressant alone (n = 50) on MADRS, social adaptation and global improvement at day 28 (p = 0.001), and the abstract also reports fewer adverse events in the Cortexin group without explaining why.
In 110 patients with neurological complications of type 2 diabetes, the DIACORT trial added ten Cortexin injections to glycine and B vitamins and reports a 1.2-fold MoCA rise (p < 0.001) and HbA1c of 7.3% versus 7.8% (p < 0.001), with 5 adverse events, none judged related. None of the three adult abstracts states blinding or a placebo, and none reports baseline values or effect sizes.
Pediatric reports are large but uncontrolled or unblinded. A multicenter study of 635 children aged 3 to 7 (269 with ADHD, 215 with speech delay, 82 with perinatal CNS lesion consequences, 69 with asthenic or neurotic syndrome) reports a reliable effect on attention, visual memory and thinking, best in ADHD at ages 3 to 4, with good tolerability, and describes no control group or blinding. A one-year study in infants with hypoxic CNS damage reports fewer myotonic and hypertensive-hydrocephalic symptoms after two courses versus none, but its abstract lists 323 children while the two named groups add to 215, so the numbers do not reconcile. An 86-child epilepsy series aged 3 to 17 with no control group reports no seizure worsening in 95% and cognitive improvement in 65%.
The label allows pediatric use, but none of these studies is a placebo-controlled trial.
Three adult studies outside stroke: 189, 98 and 110 patients, no blinding stated
Human study
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(9):35-42. PMID 30335070.
In 189 patients with stage I to II chronic cerebral ischemia (mean age 64.3), randomized to Cortexin 20 mg or 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days (repeated at 6 months) or basic treatment only, the abstract reports a dose-dependent effect on neurological symptoms, asthenia and sleep, an antioxidant effect, and insignificant antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (PMID 30335070). In 98 patients with depressive disorder, Cortexin added to an antidepressant (n = 48) beat the antidepressant alone (n = 50) on MADRS, social adaptation and global improvement at day 28 (p = 0.001), and the abstract also reports fewer adverse events in the Cortexin group, which it does not explain (PMID 41782536). In 110 patients with neurological complications of type 2 diabetes, the DIACORT trial added ten Cortexin injections to glycine and B vitamins (n = 55 versus the same treatment alone) and reports a 1.2-fold MoCA rise (p < 0.001) and HbA1c of 7.3% versus 7.8% (p < 0.001), with 5 adverse events, none judged related; the PubMed record lists no authors (PMID 42133422).
- Participants / model
- Adults with chronic cerebral ischemia, depressive disorder, or diabetic neurological complications, in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 or 20 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days, added to usual care
- Follow-up
- 10-day courses; day 28 follow-up in the depression study
- Study design
- Randomized or comparison-group studies, Russian-language; none states blinding or a placebo
- Funding
- not stated in the source
None of the three abstracts reports baseline values or effect sizes.
Read the original sourcePediatric reports: 635 children, 323 infants, 86 children with epilepsy, none placebo-controlled
Human study
Zykov VP et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(3):27-31. PMID 29652302.
A multicenter study of 635 children aged 3 to 7 (269 with ADHD, 215 with speech delay, 82 with perinatal CNS lesion consequences, 69 with asthenic or neurotic syndrome) gave a standard course of 10 intramuscular injections and reports a reliable effect on attention, visual memory and thinking, best in ADHD at ages 3 to 4, with good tolerability; the abstract describes no control group or blinding (PMID 29652302). A one-year study in infants with hypoxic CNS damage randomized to two Cortexin courses 3 months apart or none reports fewer myotonic and hypertensive-hydrocephalic symptoms (PMID 39731376); its abstract lists 323 children but the two named groups add to 215 (117 and 98), so the numbers do not reconcile. An 86-child epilepsy series aged 3 to 17 with no control group reports no seizure worsening in 95% and cognitive improvement in 65% (PMID 33834730).
- Participants / model
- Children with ADHD, speech delay, perinatal brain injury, hypoxic CNS damage, or epilepsy, in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg or 0.5 mg/kg intramuscularly in 10-day courses
- Follow-up
- 10-day courses; one year in the infant study
- Study design
- Uncontrolled or unblinded studies, Russian-language
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label allows pediatric use, but none of these is a placebo-controlled trial.
Read the original sourceDoes Cortexin protect the brain, improve cognition or speed recovery after injury?
Partly, for add-on use after ischemic stroke and in some patient groups, from Russian studies that are mostly open or comparison-group designs. Nothing found supports better cognition in healthy people, and for brain injury the records hold one comparison-group study in 74 children and reviews.
Sellers describe Cortexin as a calf or pig brain cortex polypeptide preparation, similar to Cerebrolysin, that gives neuroprotection, better cognition and recovery after brain injury.
For neuroprotection after stroke, the support is one double-blind placebo-controlled trial with no numbers in its abstract, a Cochrane review that finds probably no effect on death for Cerebrolysin and Cortexin pooled, and rat studies that disagree.
For cognition in healthy people, a PubMed search on 10 October 2026 for cortexin with healthy volunteers, healthy subjects, healthy adults, students or athletes returned 5 records, and none was a placebo-controlled test of cognition. They included a 2007 Russian study of healthy volunteers aged 20 to 24 in a climate chamber that classes Cortexin as an adaptogen only under hypobaric hypoxia, with no cognition endpoint, and a 2020 report in elderly university teachers where breathing exercises plus Cortexin beat the drug alone, with no placebo stated. A 2004 review of Cortexin for memory and attention holds no new data. The label's cognitive indication is for cognitive impairment as part of complex therapy.
For recovery after brain injury, a search for cortexin with traumatic brain injury and related terms returned 11 records. Two were reviews, one of which calls Cortexin highly effective without data in the abstract. One human study followed 74 children aged 6 to 13 with moderate brain contusion given Cortexin plus standard therapy or standard therapy alone, re-examined at 30 days with no blinding or placebo stated, and reported fewer symptoms and EEG normalization. The rest were animal, in-vitro or perinatal papers. No placebo-controlled trial of Cortexin in adults with brain injury turned up.
Placebo-controlled stroke trial, 2014: 272 patients, no numbers in the abstract
Randomized controlled trial
Aliferova VM et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(4):41-6. PMID 24874316.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses (group 1), one course then a placebo course (group 2), or two placebo courses (group 3), over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group, and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding.
- Participants / model
- 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day versus placebo
- Follow-up
- 70 days
- Study design
- Multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, three groups
- Funding
- not stated in the source
This is the only blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed. The abstract gives no endpoints, effect sizes or funding.
Read the original sourceCochrane 2023: 7 trials, 1773 participants, probably little or no effect on death
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ziganshina LE et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;10(10):CD007026. PMID 37818733.
The review included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the one Cortexin trial (272 participants), which it judged at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome (death or dependence) or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death. The increase in non-fatal serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants) is stated for Cerebrolysin, not for Cortexin.
- Participants / model
- Adults with acute ischaemic stroke across pooled randomized trials
- Treatment
- Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures, including Cortexin in one trial
- Follow-up
- Pooled randomized trials
- Study design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The serious-adverse-event signal is a class caution only, because it is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin.
Read the original sourceRat embolic stroke: Cortexin did not change function or infarct size, Cerebrolysin did
Animal study
Zhang L et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:22-26. PMID 30665068.
Working blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, the group gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002).
- Participants / model
- Male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days, compared with saline and Cerebrolysin
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment
- Study design
- Blinded, randomized animal study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out
A US group. This is not human evidence, and it disagrees with the Volgograd rat study.
Read the original sourcePubMed search, 10 October 2026: 5 records, none a placebo-controlled cognition test
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026: cortexin AND (healthy volunteers OR healthy subjects OR healthy adults OR students OR athletes). 5 records returned.
The search returned 5 records. None was a placebo-controlled test of cognition in healthy people. One title concerns cisplatin ototoxicity (PMID 29092803, abstract not reviewed), one is a neuroimaging reproducibility paper and one a resistance-training trial that matched on unrelated words, one is a 2007 Russian study of healthy volunteers aged 20 to 24 in a climate chamber that classes Cortexin as an adaptogen only under hypobaric hypoxia, with no cognition endpoint (PMID 18318195), and one is a 2020 report in elderly university teachers where breathing exercises plus Cortexin beat the drug alone, with no placebo stated (PMID 32593245). A 2004 review of Cortexin for memory and attention (PMID 15537099), found in the general search, holds no new data.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Search run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature search
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what PubMed returned on that date. The better-cognition claim has no healthy-person trial behind it in the records reviewed.
Read the original sourcePubMed search, 10 October 2026: 11 records, one comparison-group study in 74 children
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026: cortexin AND (traumatic brain injury OR head injury OR craniocerebral OR TBI OR concussion OR brain trauma). 11 records returned.
The search returned 11 records and every title was reviewed. Two were review articles (PMID 36946393, a 2023 Russian review of long-term brain injury treatment that calls Cortexin highly effective without data in the abstract, and PMID 36537632, a 2022 review of combat and emergency neurology). Two were human studies (PMID 32323940, 74 children aged 6 to 13 with moderate brain contusion, Cortexin plus standard therapy versus standard therapy, re-examined at 30 days, with no blinding or placebo stated, reporting fewer symptoms and EEG normalization; and PMID 21246892, a 2010 paper on severe brain injury with no abstract). The rest were rodent, rabbit, in-vitro, neonatal or perinatal papers. No placebo-controlled trial of Cortexin in adults with brain injury turned up.
- Participants / model
- Records returned; the one clinical study is 74 children with moderate brain contusion
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Search run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature search
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The recovery-after-brain-injury claim rests on one comparison-group pediatric study and reviews in the records reviewed.
Read the original sourceWhat do animal and cell studies show?
Results are mixed. A US rat study found Cortexin did not change function or infarct size after embolic stroke, while a Volgograd group reported better recovery in rat ischemia models. Neither is human evidence.
A US group at Henry Ford Hospital worked blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion and gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002). Funding is not stated in the abstract, and the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out.
A Volgograd group, with three authors employed by Pharm-Holding CJSC (a company the abstract does not otherwise describe), reported that Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days improved neurological recovery in rats with acute or chronic brain ischemia and, in the acute model, reduced the size of brain tissue necrosis. Radiolabeled Cortexin reached 6 to 8% of whole-blood concentrations in mouse brain, and in vitro it bound AMPA receptors (80.1%) and kainate receptors (73.5%) at 10 ug/ml. The route in the rat experiments is not stated here.
None of this is human evidence, and the two rat stroke studies disagree.
Rat embolic stroke: Cortexin did not change function or infarct size, Cerebrolysin did
Animal study
Zhang L et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:22-26. PMID 30665068.
Working blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, the group gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002).
- Participants / model
- Male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days, compared with saline and Cerebrolysin
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment
- Study design
- Blinded, randomized animal study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out
A US group. This is not human evidence, and it disagrees with the Volgograd rat study.
Read the original sourceVolgograd group: rats improved, brain exposure in mice, AMPA and kainate binding in vitro
Animal study
Kurkin DV et al. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254493. PMID 34260655.
In rats with acute or chronic brain ischemia, Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days improved neurological recovery and, in the acute model, reduced the size of brain tissue necrosis. Radiolabeled Cortexin reached 6 to 8% of whole-blood concentrations in mouse brain, and in vitro it bound AMPA receptors (80.1%) and kainate receptors (73.5%) at 10 ug/ml.
- Participants / model
- Rats (acute and chronic brain ischemia models), mice, and receptor preparations in vitro
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days in rats; in vitro exposure at 10 ug/ml
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment in rats
- Study design
- Animal and in-vitro study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; three authors are employed by Pharm-Holding CJSC, a company the abstract does not otherwise describe
Not human evidence. The route of administration in the rat experiments is not stated here, so the study is described in the text and not listed as a dosing row.
Read the original sourceHow does Cortexin work?
The label describes nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects and passage through the blood-brain barrier, but that is manufacturer text, not trial results. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis, so no half-life is established.
The Russian label's pharmacology statements are manufacturer text, not trial results. It also says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components, so no half-life or Tmax is established.
The only exposure and binding data come from one animal study with company-employed authors: radiolabeled Cortexin reached 6 to 8% of whole-blood concentrations in mouse brain, and in vitro it bound AMPA and kainate receptors. The two rat stroke studies disagree on whether Cortexin changes outcome.
Russian label (rlsnet.ru copy, version of 10 February 2022): composition, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions
Official label
rlsnet.ru drug encyclopedia. Kortexin (Cortexin) lyophilisate for intramuscular solution, Russian prescribing information, manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022; the site's own page-update date reads 21 September 2026.
The label lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, ATC code N06BX, as a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. All indications are given in complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy. It is contraindicated in individual intolerance, pregnancy (the label cites lack of clinical trial data) and lactation. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components. Every listed adverse reaction is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching, allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence, hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia, chills; raised blood pressure. Lidocaine as the injection solvent is not recommended in children because it is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate for intramuscular injection
- Follow-up
- Label version dated 10 February 2022
- Study design
- Russian-language prescribing information reproduced on a drug-information site; a regional label, not an FDA or EMA review
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label's pharmacology statements (nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects, passage through the blood-brain barrier) are manufacturer text, not trial results. The Russian text was translated for this page. The label version read is dated 10 February 2022, and a later version may differ.
Read the original sourceVolgograd group: rats improved, brain exposure in mice, AMPA and kainate binding in vitro
Animal study
Kurkin DV et al. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254493. PMID 34260655.
In rats with acute or chronic brain ischemia, Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days improved neurological recovery and, in the acute model, reduced the size of brain tissue necrosis. Radiolabeled Cortexin reached 6 to 8% of whole-blood concentrations in mouse brain, and in vitro it bound AMPA receptors (80.1%) and kainate receptors (73.5%) at 10 ug/ml.
- Participants / model
- Rats (acute and chronic brain ischemia models), mice, and receptor preparations in vitro
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days in rats; in vitro exposure at 10 ug/ml
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment in rats
- Study design
- Animal and in-vitro study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; three authors are employed by Pharm-Holding CJSC, a company the abstract does not otherwise describe
Not human evidence. The route of administration in the rat experiments is not stated here, so the study is described in the text and not listed as a dosing row.
Read the original sourceRat embolic stroke: Cortexin did not change function or infarct size, Cerebrolysin did
Animal study
Zhang L et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:22-26. PMID 30665068.
Working blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, the group gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002).
- Participants / model
- Male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days, compared with saline and Cerebrolysin
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment
- Study design
- Blinded, randomized animal study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out
A US group. This is not human evidence, and it disagrees with the Volgograd rat study.
Read the original sourceWhat adverse reactions and warnings do the label and trials report?
The Russian label contraindicates individual intolerance, pregnancy and lactation, and lists only very rare adverse reactions (under 1 in 10,000), including anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity. In the 490-patient route trial, adverse events did not differ between intravenous and intramuscular dosing.
Every adverse reaction on the Russian label is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching and allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence and hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia and chills; and raised blood pressure. It contraindicates individual intolerance, pregnancy (citing lack of clinical trial data) and lactation, and it does not recommend lidocaine as the injection solvent in children because lidocaine is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
In the 490-patient route trial, adverse events were 74 in 60 patients (intravenous) and 51 in 41 patients (intramuscular), not different (p above 0.05). The 2014 placebo-controlled trial reports high safety without numbers, and the DIACORT trial reported 5 adverse events, none judged related.
The Cochrane review found more non-fatal serious adverse events with Cerebrolysin (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants). That finding is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin, so it is a class caution only.
No pharmacokinetic data exist, since the label says conventional analysis is not possible, and no source on viral or prion safety testing of the animal-derived raw material was found. Because the composition is not defined, a vendor product cannot be matched to the studied one.
Russian label (rlsnet.ru copy, version of 10 February 2022): composition, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions
Official label
rlsnet.ru drug encyclopedia. Kortexin (Cortexin) lyophilisate for intramuscular solution, Russian prescribing information, manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022; the site's own page-update date reads 21 September 2026.
The label lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, ATC code N06BX, as a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. All indications are given in complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy. It is contraindicated in individual intolerance, pregnancy (the label cites lack of clinical trial data) and lactation. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components. Every listed adverse reaction is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching, allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence, hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia, chills; raised blood pressure. Lidocaine as the injection solvent is not recommended in children because it is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate for intramuscular injection
- Follow-up
- Label version dated 10 February 2022
- Study design
- Russian-language prescribing information reproduced on a drug-information site; a regional label, not an FDA or EMA review
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label's pharmacology statements (nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects, passage through the blood-brain barrier) are manufacturer text, not trial results. The Russian text was translated for this page. The label version read is dated 10 February 2022, and a later version may differ.
Read the original sourceRoute trial: 490 patients, intravenous versus intramuscular Cortexin, no placebo arm
Clinical trial
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2025;125(12):60-67. PMID 41524350.
In 490 patients aged 30 to 80 with acute ischemic stroke, Cortexin 10 mg intravenous plus placebo intramuscular twice a day (n = 246) was compared with Cortexin 10 mg intramuscular plus placebo intravenous twice a day (n = 244) for 10 days, then both groups got 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up. On day 90, 93.64% of the intravenous group and 86.50% of the intramuscular group had a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2; NIHSS fell by 3.93 and 3.72; the MMSE gain was 4.11 and 3.88 (p = 0.249). Adverse events were 74 in 60 patients (intravenous) and 51 in 41 patients (intramuscular), not different (p above 0.05).
- Participants / model
- 490 adults with acute ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg twice a day, intravenous versus intramuscular
- Follow-up
- 10 days of randomized treatment, then 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up
- Study design
- Multicenter randomized double-blind route comparison with a double-dummy placebo; every patient received Cortexin
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The abstract calls the design placebo-controlled, but the placebo only masks the route and every patient received Cortexin, so there is no placebo-only or no-treatment arm and the trial says nothing about whether Cortexin beats placebo. Funding is not stated in the abstract.
Read the original sourcePlacebo-controlled stroke trial, 2014: 272 patients, no numbers in the abstract
Randomized controlled trial
Aliferova VM et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(4):41-6. PMID 24874316.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses (group 1), one course then a placebo course (group 2), or two placebo courses (group 3), over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group, and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding.
- Participants / model
- 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day versus placebo
- Follow-up
- 70 days
- Study design
- Multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, three groups
- Funding
- not stated in the source
This is the only blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed. The abstract gives no endpoints, effect sizes or funding.
Read the original sourceThree adult studies outside stroke: 189, 98 and 110 patients, no blinding stated
Human study
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(9):35-42. PMID 30335070.
In 189 patients with stage I to II chronic cerebral ischemia (mean age 64.3), randomized to Cortexin 20 mg or 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days (repeated at 6 months) or basic treatment only, the abstract reports a dose-dependent effect on neurological symptoms, asthenia and sleep, an antioxidant effect, and insignificant antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (PMID 30335070). In 98 patients with depressive disorder, Cortexin added to an antidepressant (n = 48) beat the antidepressant alone (n = 50) on MADRS, social adaptation and global improvement at day 28 (p = 0.001), and the abstract also reports fewer adverse events in the Cortexin group, which it does not explain (PMID 41782536). In 110 patients with neurological complications of type 2 diabetes, the DIACORT trial added ten Cortexin injections to glycine and B vitamins (n = 55 versus the same treatment alone) and reports a 1.2-fold MoCA rise (p < 0.001) and HbA1c of 7.3% versus 7.8% (p < 0.001), with 5 adverse events, none judged related; the PubMed record lists no authors (PMID 42133422).
- Participants / model
- Adults with chronic cerebral ischemia, depressive disorder, or diabetic neurological complications, in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 or 20 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days, added to usual care
- Follow-up
- 10-day courses; day 28 follow-up in the depression study
- Study design
- Randomized or comparison-group studies, Russian-language; none states blinding or a placebo
- Funding
- not stated in the source
None of the three abstracts reports baseline values or effect sizes.
Read the original sourceCochrane 2023: 7 trials, 1773 participants, probably little or no effect on death
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ziganshina LE et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;10(10):CD007026. PMID 37818733.
The review included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the one Cortexin trial (272 participants), which it judged at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome (death or dependence) or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death. The increase in non-fatal serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants) is stated for Cerebrolysin, not for Cortexin.
- Participants / model
- Adults with acute ischaemic stroke across pooled randomized trials
- Treatment
- Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures, including Cortexin in one trial
- Follow-up
- Pooled randomized trials
- Study design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The serious-adverse-event signal is a class caution only, because it is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin.
Read the original sourcePubChem: no compound record, three substance records, no formula or structure
Chemical identity record
National Library of Medicine. PubChem substance records SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox), registry number 83270-84-2; PubChem name query for cortexin run on 10 October 2026.
A PubChem name query for cortexin returned no compound (No CID found). Three substance records carry the name and the same registry number, 83270-84-2: SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox). None has a linked compound, so there is no formula, molecular weight or structure. The word also names unrelated things in PubMed: an 82-residue neuron-specific membrane protein called cortexin (PMID 8336151), a cortexin 3 gene paper (PMID 17786280) and renal cortexin blood-pressure papers (PMID 20409952), so a bare search mixes them in. A different product, the brain cortex tetrapeptide Cortagen (named in the title of PMID 15159690), also turns up in the same search results and is not this preparation.
- Participants / model
- Chemical identity, not a clinical population
- Treatment
- Undefined mixture of polypeptide fractions
- Follow-up
- Not applicable
- Study design
- NLM chemical substance records
- Funding
- not stated in the source
Identity record only. A vendor vial sold as Cortexin cannot be matched to the studied product from public records.
Read the original sourceWhy does Cortexin sit in D tier?
D reflects a licensed Russian mixture whose claims outrun the data: one placebo-controlled stroke trial with no numbers in its abstract, one route trial with no placebo arm, and otherwise open or comparison-group studies. It is not F because no documented serious harm turned up and every label adverse reaction is very rare.
The D applies to adjunct use after ischemic stroke and in the patient groups studied, not to the supplier's claim of better cognition in healthy people, which has no trial behind it. There are no registered trials, no Western replication and no pharmacokinetics, and the composition is not defined.
A US rat embolic-stroke study found no effect of Cortexin on function or infarct size while Cerebrolysin worked, and the Cochrane review that pools Cortexin with Cerebrolysin finds probably no effect on death.
Placebo-controlled stroke trial, 2014: 272 patients, no numbers in the abstract
Randomized controlled trial
Aliferova VM et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(4):41-6. PMID 24874316.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses (group 1), one course then a placebo course (group 2), or two placebo courses (group 3), over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group, and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding.
- Participants / model
- 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day versus placebo
- Follow-up
- 70 days
- Study design
- Multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, three groups
- Funding
- not stated in the source
This is the only blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed. The abstract gives no endpoints, effect sizes or funding.
Read the original sourceRoute trial: 490 patients, intravenous versus intramuscular Cortexin, no placebo arm
Clinical trial
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2025;125(12):60-67. PMID 41524350.
In 490 patients aged 30 to 80 with acute ischemic stroke, Cortexin 10 mg intravenous plus placebo intramuscular twice a day (n = 246) was compared with Cortexin 10 mg intramuscular plus placebo intravenous twice a day (n = 244) for 10 days, then both groups got 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up. On day 90, 93.64% of the intravenous group and 86.50% of the intramuscular group had a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2; NIHSS fell by 3.93 and 3.72; the MMSE gain was 4.11 and 3.88 (p = 0.249). Adverse events were 74 in 60 patients (intravenous) and 51 in 41 patients (intramuscular), not different (p above 0.05).
- Participants / model
- 490 adults with acute ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg twice a day, intravenous versus intramuscular
- Follow-up
- 10 days of randomized treatment, then 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up
- Study design
- Multicenter randomized double-blind route comparison with a double-dummy placebo; every patient received Cortexin
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The abstract calls the design placebo-controlled, but the placebo only masks the route and every patient received Cortexin, so there is no placebo-only or no-treatment arm and the trial says nothing about whether Cortexin beats placebo. Funding is not stated in the abstract.
Read the original sourceCochrane 2023: 7 trials, 1773 participants, probably little or no effect on death
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ziganshina LE et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;10(10):CD007026. PMID 37818733.
The review included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the one Cortexin trial (272 participants), which it judged at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome (death or dependence) or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death. The increase in non-fatal serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants) is stated for Cerebrolysin, not for Cortexin.
- Participants / model
- Adults with acute ischaemic stroke across pooled randomized trials
- Treatment
- Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures, including Cortexin in one trial
- Follow-up
- Pooled randomized trials
- Study design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The serious-adverse-event signal is a class caution only, because it is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin.
Read the original sourceRat embolic stroke: Cortexin did not change function or infarct size, Cerebrolysin did
Animal study
Zhang L et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:22-26. PMID 30665068.
Working blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, the group gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002).
- Participants / model
- Male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days, compared with saline and Cerebrolysin
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment
- Study design
- Blinded, randomized animal study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out
A US group. This is not human evidence, and it disagrees with the Volgograd rat study.
Read the original sourceSearches, 10 October 2026: 217 PubMed records, 0 registered trials, no US label
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026 for cortexin, 217 records returned. ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA Drugs@FDA and DailyMed searches run the same day.
The PubMed search returned 217 records, of which 150 are flagged Russian-language and 102 appeared in a single Russian journal (Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova). The titles of the 80 most relevant results and the abstracts of the studies cited on this page were reviewed. Two human trials were double-blind (the 490-patient route comparison and the 272-patient placebo-controlled trial); the other human studies reviewed were open, comparison-group or uncontrolled designs with no blinding stated in the abstract. No English-language randomized placebo-controlled human trial of Cortexin turned up. ClinicalTrials.gov API searches returned 0 records each for cortexin, the Cyrillic brand name, polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle, Geropharm ischemic stroke and Geropharm cerebral, so registration of the trials above cannot be confirmed. openFDA Drugs@FDA searches on generic name, brand name and active ingredient cortexin each returned no matches, and DailyMed searches for cortexin, cerebral cortex polypeptides and polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle returned zero labels, so there is no US label.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Searches run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature, registry and regulator database searches
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what the databases returned on that date. It is not proof that no unindexed study or registration exists. Eurasian Economic Union and other post-Soviet registrations were not looked up.
Read the original sourceRussian label (rlsnet.ru copy, version of 10 February 2022): composition, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions
Official label
rlsnet.ru drug encyclopedia. Kortexin (Cortexin) lyophilisate for intramuscular solution, Russian prescribing information, manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022; the site's own page-update date reads 21 September 2026.
The label lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, ATC code N06BX, as a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. All indications are given in complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy. It is contraindicated in individual intolerance, pregnancy (the label cites lack of clinical trial data) and lactation. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components. Every listed adverse reaction is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching, allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence, hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia, chills; raised blood pressure. Lidocaine as the injection solvent is not recommended in children because it is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate for intramuscular injection
- Follow-up
- Label version dated 10 February 2022
- Study design
- Russian-language prescribing information reproduced on a drug-information site; a regional label, not an FDA or EMA review
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label's pharmacology statements (nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects, passage through the blood-brain barrier) are manufacturer text, not trial results. The Russian text was translated for this page. The label version read is dated 10 February 2022, and a later version may differ.
Read the original sourceStudies and sources
Russian label (rlsnet.ru copy, version of 10 February 2022): composition, indications, contraindications, adverse reactions
Official label
rlsnet.ru drug encyclopedia. Kortexin (Cortexin) lyophilisate for intramuscular solution, Russian prescribing information, manufacturer-approved version dated 10 February 2022; the site's own page-update date reads 21 September 2026.
The label lists the active substance as polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, ATC code N06BX, as a lyophilisate for intramuscular solution with glycine as stabilizer. It describes Cortexin as a complex of water-soluble polypeptide fractions with molecular weight not more than 10,000 Da. All indications are given in complex therapy: cerebrovascular disorders, traumatic brain injury and its consequences, encephalopathies of various origin, cognitive impairment (memory and thinking disorders), acute and chronic encephalitis and encephalomyelitis, epilepsy, asthenic states, reduced learning ability, delayed psychomotor and speech development in children, and various forms of infantile cerebral palsy. It is contraindicated in individual intolerance, pregnancy (the label cites lack of clinical trial data) and lactation. The label says the composition does not allow conventional pharmacokinetic analysis of individual components. Every listed adverse reaction is very rare (under 1 in 10,000): anaphylactic shock and hypersensitivity; angioedema, erythema, urticaria, rash, itching, allergic dermatitis; psychomotor agitation, impaired coordination, headache, dizziness, somnolence, hypoesthesia; tachycardia and arrhythmia; anxiety and insomnia; injection-site redness, fever, asthenia, chills; raised blood pressure. Lidocaine as the injection solvent is not recommended in children because it is linked to more severe adverse reactions.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate for intramuscular injection
- Follow-up
- Label version dated 10 February 2022
- Study design
- Russian-language prescribing information reproduced on a drug-information site; a regional label, not an FDA or EMA review
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label's pharmacology statements (nootropic, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects, passage through the blood-brain barrier) are manufacturer text, not trial results. The Russian text was translated for this page. The label version read is dated 10 February 2022, and a later version may differ.
Read the original sourceTwo Russian leaflet copies (2019): registration numbers, manufacturers, prescription-only
Official label
medi.ru drug-information site. Kortexin leaflet copies for the 10 mg product (copy dated 8 February 2019) and the 5 mg product (copy dated 4 February 2019).
Two Russian leaflet copies on medi.ru give registration numbers and manufacturers. The 10 mg leaflet (copy dated 8 February 2019) prints registration number R N003862/02, the R in Cyrillic letters, with the grouping name polypeptides of the cerebral cortex of cattle, glycine in each vial, prescription-only dispensing, a 3-year shelf life, and two manufacturers: Geropharm LLC and Firma Ferment LLC, both in Russia. The 5 mg leaflet (copy dated 4 February 2019) prints registration number LSR-003190/09 and Geropharm LLC as manufacturer.
- Participants / model
- Adults and children in Russia, label population
- Treatment
- Kortexin lyophilisate, intramuscular
- Follow-up
- Leaflet copies dated February 2019
- Study design
- Russian-language leaflet copies hosted on a commercial drug-information site
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The copies are on a commercial site, not the Russian state register, so current registration status and label version are not confirmed here.
Read the original sourceRoute trial: 490 patients, intravenous versus intramuscular Cortexin, no placebo arm
Clinical trial
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2025;125(12):60-67. PMID 41524350.
In 490 patients aged 30 to 80 with acute ischemic stroke, Cortexin 10 mg intravenous plus placebo intramuscular twice a day (n = 246) was compared with Cortexin 10 mg intramuscular plus placebo intravenous twice a day (n = 244) for 10 days, then both groups got 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up. On day 90, 93.64% of the intravenous group and 86.50% of the intramuscular group had a modified Rankin score of 0 to 2; NIHSS fell by 3.93 and 3.72; the MMSE gain was 4.11 and 3.88 (p = 0.249). Adverse events were 74 in 60 patients (intravenous) and 51 in 41 patients (intramuscular), not different (p above 0.05).
- Participants / model
- 490 adults with acute ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg twice a day, intravenous versus intramuscular
- Follow-up
- 10 days of randomized treatment, then 10 days of intramuscular Cortexin, with 90 days of follow-up
- Study design
- Multicenter randomized double-blind route comparison with a double-dummy placebo; every patient received Cortexin
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The abstract calls the design placebo-controlled, but the placebo only masks the route and every patient received Cortexin, so there is no placebo-only or no-treatment arm and the trial says nothing about whether Cortexin beats placebo. Funding is not stated in the abstract.
Read the original sourcePubChem: no compound record, three substance records, no formula or structure
Chemical identity record
National Library of Medicine. PubChem substance records SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox), registry number 83270-84-2; PubChem name query for cortexin run on 10 October 2026.
A PubChem name query for cortexin returned no compound (No CID found). Three substance records carry the name and the same registry number, 83270-84-2: SID 134223142 (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database), SID 135311035 (ChemIDplus) and SID 472219636 (EPA DSSTox). None has a linked compound, so there is no formula, molecular weight or structure. The word also names unrelated things in PubMed: an 82-residue neuron-specific membrane protein called cortexin (PMID 8336151), a cortexin 3 gene paper (PMID 17786280) and renal cortexin blood-pressure papers (PMID 20409952), so a bare search mixes them in. A different product, the brain cortex tetrapeptide Cortagen (named in the title of PMID 15159690), also turns up in the same search results and is not this preparation.
- Participants / model
- Chemical identity, not a clinical population
- Treatment
- Undefined mixture of polypeptide fractions
- Follow-up
- Not applicable
- Study design
- NLM chemical substance records
- Funding
- not stated in the source
Identity record only. A vendor vial sold as Cortexin cannot be matched to the studied product from public records.
Read the original sourcePlacebo-controlled stroke trial, 2014: 272 patients, no numbers in the abstract
Randomized controlled trial
Aliferova VM et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2014;114(4):41-6. PMID 24874316.
A multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial enrolled 272 patients with ischemic stroke. They received Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day as two 10-day courses (group 1), one course then a placebo course (group 2), or two placebo courses (group 3), over 70 days. The abstract reports high efficacy and safety, the best effect in the two-course group, and a favorable pharmacoeconomic result, but gives no numbers, primary endpoint or funding.
- Participants / model
- 272 patients with ischemic stroke in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg intramuscularly three times a day versus placebo
- Follow-up
- 70 days
- Study design
- Multicenter prospective double-blind placebo-controlled trial, three groups
- Funding
- not stated in the source
This is the only blinded, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of Cortexin found in the records reviewed. The abstract gives no endpoints, effect sizes or funding.
Read the original sourceCochrane 2023: 7 trials, 1773 participants, probably little or no effect on death
Systematic review and meta-analysis
Ziganshina LE et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;10(10):CD007026. PMID 37818733.
The review included seven randomized trials (1773 participants), among them the one Cortexin trial (272 participants), which it judged at low risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and unclear risk for all other domains. For all-cause death, Cerebrolysin or Cortexin probably made little to no difference (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.41; 6 trials, 1689 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No included study reported poor functional outcome (death or dependence) or quality of life. The authors conclude that Cerebrolysin or Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures from cattle brain probably do not prevent death. The increase in non-fatal serious adverse events (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.10 to 5.23; 3 trials, 1335 participants) is stated for Cerebrolysin, not for Cortexin.
- Participants / model
- Adults with acute ischaemic stroke across pooled randomized trials
- Treatment
- Cerebrolysin and Cerebrolysin-like peptide mixtures, including Cortexin in one trial
- Follow-up
- Pooled randomized trials
- Study design
- Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The serious-adverse-event signal is a class caution only, because it is stated for Cerebrolysin and not for Cortexin.
Read the original sourceThree adult studies outside stroke: 189, 98 and 110 patients, no blinding stated
Human study
Fedin AI et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(9):35-42. PMID 30335070.
In 189 patients with stage I to II chronic cerebral ischemia (mean age 64.3), randomized to Cortexin 20 mg or 10 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days (repeated at 6 months) or basic treatment only, the abstract reports a dose-dependent effect on neurological symptoms, asthenia and sleep, an antioxidant effect, and insignificant antidepressant and anxiolytic effects (PMID 30335070). In 98 patients with depressive disorder, Cortexin added to an antidepressant (n = 48) beat the antidepressant alone (n = 50) on MADRS, social adaptation and global improvement at day 28 (p = 0.001), and the abstract also reports fewer adverse events in the Cortexin group, which it does not explain (PMID 41782536). In 110 patients with neurological complications of type 2 diabetes, the DIACORT trial added ten Cortexin injections to glycine and B vitamins (n = 55 versus the same treatment alone) and reports a 1.2-fold MoCA rise (p < 0.001) and HbA1c of 7.3% versus 7.8% (p < 0.001), with 5 adverse events, none judged related; the PubMed record lists no authors (PMID 42133422).
- Participants / model
- Adults with chronic cerebral ischemia, depressive disorder, or diabetic neurological complications, in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 or 20 mg intramuscularly daily for 10 days, added to usual care
- Follow-up
- 10-day courses; day 28 follow-up in the depression study
- Study design
- Randomized or comparison-group studies, Russian-language; none states blinding or a placebo
- Funding
- not stated in the source
None of the three abstracts reports baseline values or effect sizes.
Read the original sourcePediatric reports: 635 children, 323 infants, 86 children with epilepsy, none placebo-controlled
Human study
Zykov VP et al. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2018;118(3):27-31. PMID 29652302.
A multicenter study of 635 children aged 3 to 7 (269 with ADHD, 215 with speech delay, 82 with perinatal CNS lesion consequences, 69 with asthenic or neurotic syndrome) gave a standard course of 10 intramuscular injections and reports a reliable effect on attention, visual memory and thinking, best in ADHD at ages 3 to 4, with good tolerability; the abstract describes no control group or blinding (PMID 29652302). A one-year study in infants with hypoxic CNS damage randomized to two Cortexin courses 3 months apart or none reports fewer myotonic and hypertensive-hydrocephalic symptoms (PMID 39731376); its abstract lists 323 children but the two named groups add to 215 (117 and 98), so the numbers do not reconcile. An 86-child epilepsy series aged 3 to 17 with no control group reports no seizure worsening in 95% and cognitive improvement in 65% (PMID 33834730).
- Participants / model
- Children with ADHD, speech delay, perinatal brain injury, hypoxic CNS damage, or epilepsy, in Russia
- Treatment
- Cortexin 10 mg or 0.5 mg/kg intramuscularly in 10-day courses
- Follow-up
- 10-day courses; one year in the infant study
- Study design
- Uncontrolled or unblinded studies, Russian-language
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The label allows pediatric use, but none of these is a placebo-controlled trial.
Read the original sourceSearches, 10 October 2026: 217 PubMed records, 0 registered trials, no US label
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026 for cortexin, 217 records returned. ClinicalTrials.gov, openFDA Drugs@FDA and DailyMed searches run the same day.
The PubMed search returned 217 records, of which 150 are flagged Russian-language and 102 appeared in a single Russian journal (Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova). The titles of the 80 most relevant results and the abstracts of the studies cited on this page were reviewed. Two human trials were double-blind (the 490-patient route comparison and the 272-patient placebo-controlled trial); the other human studies reviewed were open, comparison-group or uncontrolled designs with no blinding stated in the abstract. No English-language randomized placebo-controlled human trial of Cortexin turned up. ClinicalTrials.gov API searches returned 0 records each for cortexin, the Cyrillic brand name, polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle, Geropharm ischemic stroke and Geropharm cerebral, so registration of the trials above cannot be confirmed. openFDA Drugs@FDA searches on generic name, brand name and active ingredient cortexin each returned no matches, and DailyMed searches for cortexin, cerebral cortex polypeptides and polypeptides of cerebral cortex of cattle returned zero labels, so there is no US label.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Searches run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature, registry and regulator database searches
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what the databases returned on that date. It is not proof that no unindexed study or registration exists. Eurasian Economic Union and other post-Soviet registrations were not looked up.
Read the original sourcePubMed search, 10 October 2026: 5 records, none a placebo-controlled cognition test
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026: cortexin AND (healthy volunteers OR healthy subjects OR healthy adults OR students OR athletes). 5 records returned.
The search returned 5 records. None was a placebo-controlled test of cognition in healthy people. One title concerns cisplatin ototoxicity (PMID 29092803, abstract not reviewed), one is a neuroimaging reproducibility paper and one a resistance-training trial that matched on unrelated words, one is a 2007 Russian study of healthy volunteers aged 20 to 24 in a climate chamber that classes Cortexin as an adaptogen only under hypobaric hypoxia, with no cognition endpoint (PMID 18318195), and one is a 2020 report in elderly university teachers where breathing exercises plus Cortexin beat the drug alone, with no placebo stated (PMID 32593245). A 2004 review of Cortexin for memory and attention (PMID 15537099), found in the general search, holds no new data.
- Participants / model
- Records returned, not a population
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Search run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature search
- Funding
- not stated in the source
A search result shows what PubMed returned on that date. The better-cognition claim has no healthy-person trial behind it in the records reviewed.
Read the original sourcePubMed search, 10 October 2026: 11 records, one comparison-group study in 74 children
PubMed search record
PubMed search run on 10 October 2026: cortexin AND (traumatic brain injury OR head injury OR craniocerebral OR TBI OR concussion OR brain trauma). 11 records returned.
The search returned 11 records and every title was reviewed. Two were review articles (PMID 36946393, a 2023 Russian review of long-term brain injury treatment that calls Cortexin highly effective without data in the abstract, and PMID 36537632, a 2022 review of combat and emergency neurology). Two were human studies (PMID 32323940, 74 children aged 6 to 13 with moderate brain contusion, Cortexin plus standard therapy versus standard therapy, re-examined at 30 days, with no blinding or placebo stated, reporting fewer symptoms and EEG normalization; and PMID 21246892, a 2010 paper on severe brain injury with no abstract). The rest were rodent, rabbit, in-vitro, neonatal or perinatal papers. No placebo-controlled trial of Cortexin in adults with brain injury turned up.
- Participants / model
- Records returned; the one clinical study is 74 children with moderate brain contusion
- Treatment
- Not applicable
- Follow-up
- Search run on 10 October 2026
- Study design
- Literature search
- Funding
- not stated in the source
The recovery-after-brain-injury claim rests on one comparison-group pediatric study and reviews in the records reviewed.
Read the original sourceRat embolic stroke: Cortexin did not change function or infarct size, Cerebrolysin did
Animal study
Zhang L et al. J Neurol Sci. 2019;398:22-26. PMID 30665068.
Working blinded and randomized in male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion, the group gave Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days from 4 hours after occlusion. Functional outcome was similar to saline, and infarct size was not different (33.5 +/- 1.9% versus 30.8 +/- 2.1% for saline), while Cerebrolysin alone improved neurological outcome (p < 0.002).
- Participants / model
- Male Wistar rats with embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1.7 mg/kg intraperitoneally once daily for 10 days, compared with saline and Cerebrolysin
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment
- Study design
- Blinded, randomized animal study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; the group's earlier work was on Cerebrolysin, so interest on the Cerebrolysin side cannot be ruled out
A US group. This is not human evidence, and it disagrees with the Volgograd rat study.
Read the original sourceVolgograd group: rats improved, brain exposure in mice, AMPA and kainate binding in vitro
Animal study
Kurkin DV et al. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254493. PMID 34260655.
In rats with acute or chronic brain ischemia, Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days improved neurological recovery and, in the acute model, reduced the size of brain tissue necrosis. Radiolabeled Cortexin reached 6 to 8% of whole-blood concentrations in mouse brain, and in vitro it bound AMPA receptors (80.1%) and kainate receptors (73.5%) at 10 ug/ml.
- Participants / model
- Rats (acute and chronic brain ischemia models), mice, and receptor preparations in vitro
- Treatment
- Cortexin 1 or 3 mg/kg a day for 10 days in rats; in vitro exposure at 10 ug/ml
- Follow-up
- 10 days of treatment in rats
- Study design
- Animal and in-vitro study
- Funding
- not stated in the abstract; three authors are employed by Pharm-Holding CJSC, a company the abstract does not otherwise describe
Not human evidence. The route of administration in the rat experiments is not stated here, so the study is described in the text and not listed as a dosing row.
Read the original sourceWhy is Cortexin in D tier?
D fits a nationally licensed Russian mixture whose claims outrun its data: one double-blind placebo-controlled stroke trial with no numbers in its abstract, one route-comparison trial with no placebo arm, and otherwise open or comparison-group Russian studies. There are no registered trials, no Western replication and no pharmacokinetics, a US rat study found no effect, and the uncharacterized composition means a vendor vial cannot be matched to the studied product. No documented serious harm turned up, which keeps it above F.